Retry failed checkout payments
- Sessions
- 18
- Changes
- 7
Why Sabia
The bill shows what you pay. Your AI tools show chats. Neither shows the work.
Sabia follows each piece of work your team makes with AI, from the first session to the finished doc, deck or pull request.
A proposal or a pull request takes many sessions and many edits. Sabia keeps them together on the work they built, so you see its whole history.
The doc, deck, sheet, pull request or issue that lasts.
Each time AI helped create or edit it.
The people, tools and sessions behind each change.
Wherever the work lives today:
Not a copy of the chat: the real doc or pull request, as it stands today.
01
Each AI session points to the doc, deck, sheet, issue or pull request it touched.
02
Title, owner, reviews and whether it shipped, read from the tool that holds it.
03
Your rules run on the work itself, not on the chat that made it.
Usage by model, person, tool and project. Where a provider bills by usage, you see the spend it reports. Seat plans like Claude Pro and Max have no per-use bill, so Claude Code, Cowork and Codex usage is valued at API rates and marked as modelled.
Many sessions build one piece of work. Your rules check that work as it stands, like a pull request merged with its checks passing.
Retry failed checkout payments
Q3 AI program performance, current draft
Sales forecast with AI-built scenarios
Quarterly operating review slides
Customer proposal, revised after legal review
Automate the monthly close checklist
Privacy by default
AI tool connections bring in usage. Work tool connections bring in the work, so it can be checked. Sabia holds only what you connect.
Every record is checked against its organization twice: in the app, and again in the database.
Encrypted with AES-256-GCM, in a part of the database the app never exposes.
Each connection asks for the narrowest access the tool allows. Revoke any of them at any time.
Tracing tools follow each AI run. Finance tools split up the bill. Each AI vendor's dashboard covers only its own product. Sabia follows the work itself: what AI produced, the usage behind it, and whether it held up.
Writing from Sabia on AI cost, output, and quality.
Compare Sabia with the alternativesSabia connects ChatGPT, Claude, Cursor and the rest, and shows every doc, deck and pull request your team made with them, and whether it held up.